Passion without fornication. The rush of an equal engaging in conversation. Oh to be alive in the time of the French salons where ideas could fly and mold individuals.
The only debate I find in the real world revolves around which person should be head of state, which is pointless because it is temporary and it's either or not what if.
atoms dont exist.
viruses dont exist.
evolution is cope.
women should not be voting as a matter of principle.
bring it.
I find it funny that I only tend to agree with the last one, but we probably have different reasons.
Atoms are humans' way of describing chaos for a mere fleeting moment.
Viruses are a great vessel for DNA that has created it as a survival method.
Evolution is an observation of passive systems bumping into each other, and humans need to describe and compartmentalize them.
Women should be voting as a matter of ability. men are infinitely more expandable and not really required for a civil society once the ability to project aggression goes beyond physical altercations with blunt or sharp tools.
lol... dont know where you got this crap but ok...
as far as viruses maybe check this out if interested...
https://www.amazon.com/Virus-Mania-COVID-19-Hepatitis-Billion-Dollar/dp/3752629789
“You love Rome Drusilla, but forsake Jove”
for "evolution" you may take a look at Rene Guenon :
"René Guénon (1886-1951) was one of the founders of the Perennialist/Traditionalist school of comparative religious thought. In a time of unquestioning belief in the dogmas of progress and evolution, Guénon issued a devastating critique of the modern world. A pioneering philosopher, he also provided the intellectual keys for a reclamation of the West’s spiritual riches through an exposition of the Eastern metaphysical doctrines. This anthology of his essential writings is divided into four parts: 1. The Modern World; 2. The Metaphysical World; 3. The Hindu World; and 4. The Traditional World."
as far as women voting i mean , have fun in the hell that has unfolded all around you in america since the 19th was passed - they shouldnt vote because of their NATURE:
https://www.unz.com/article/the-nature-of-women-and-the-woke-problem/
and of course there are exceptions but as the saying goes - they prove the rule.
Your antiSemitic website didn’t fool me. I am a egalitarian feminist.
Leaving aside your implication that there is something "wrong" with "antisemitism" - whatever the fuck that is -
Ron Unz is a Jew you fucking NPC party-line repeater:
are you a male feminist?
there is a special place in hell for you.
So forgive me. It's not suicide your god can forgive me, correct?
I live a life where morality is defined by creating the most good, not decreed by some invisible omnipotent being.
Besides I find it rather tripe that I am required to have faith in a being that has infinite love but only if I believe.
define good.
A moral action that derives the most utility.
and the "moral" - where does it come from ?
Moral advocates actions that foster happiness or pleasure and oppose actions that cause unhappiness or harm.
You’re talking like you think men are brutes. They’re not, or expendable either.
thanks i didnt want to get into it but its retarded.
you think men are corrupt or cruel or unobjective - wait till you see what women with power are capable of!
you aint seen nothing yet.
I meant that a single male can repopulate an entire population, where a single women probably topping out in the teens.
I perceive that previous to civil law life was indeed nasty brutish and short, as competition for resources was life and death.
so, numbers then? thats what's important?
Simply that procreation is one sided, but that doesn’t limit ones brain to develop logical reasoning.
Yeah, I turn on the radio and it's like... *sigh*
I'm tired of talking about famous people soundbites. I want to talk about things and ideas.
