“far from normal” doesn’t have any relevance to any situation ever.
If you ask random liberal, Trump making a speech meets the definition.
As the liberal screechers have said since trump too office, sure he did the thing, let’s see if the courts agree it’s legal.
I say we roll with that option.
I vote for the arrest of Newsome to make the insurrectionists take notice.
Remember, nobody is above the law.
Your point. Far from normal does not imply for anything to be bad.
I think it is very bad how Trump legitimates his actions by claims that protesters are "paid insurrectionists".
I would mean an official person like Trump would need to have very good proof, to speak like this.
"I vote for the arrest of Newsome to make the insurrectionists take notice."
So you are speaking out for political arrest without illegal actions of Newman? Or is there some claims of illegal actions from his side?
Nobody is above the law.
If there is a federal crime Newsome committed, he should be arrested.
The word “Political” would not be appropriate here. That’s when you create innovative ways to change statutes of limitation and new legal theory to try to imprison your political opponent.
So based on which law would you say Newsome commited a criminal act? I would rather say, that Donald Trump did not respect the federal sovereignty. I think only people who support centralisation of power would support Trumps actions.
I would say it is very clearly against the federation and the sovereignty of the states.
I’m sure you would rather make that argument. That’s the MSM playbook.
1. Donald Trump does a thing
2. That “thing” is bad because—- fill in the blank.
3. That thing is likely illegal because—- fill in the blank.
4. Is DJT president?
a. No —- arrest him
b. Nationwide TRO
To answer your first question: I repeat… If newsome committed a crime, prosecute him. Nobody is above the law.
"If newsome committed a crime, prosecute him. Nobody is above the law.", I totally agree.
I am not following some playbook, as you assume it. I just follow the news of what is happening. And I think personally, that power should always be as close to the people as possible. Minimalize delegation of power and federate as much decision making to everyone when possible. And it is easy to see, that Trup is rowing against my ideal with his actions.
He is trying to concentrate power and take it away from the individual states.
So I assume you are hugely in favor of him sending Roe vs Wade to the dustbin of history and the decision on abortion back to the states, as the constitution requires.
And you are reading the situation in California differently than I am.
ICE should be allowed to do their job unimpeded, with zero resistance or friction from any state actors. If that is not happening, the President should have the right to ensure that it does.
That’s how I read California. Not a presidential overreach. But again, *everything* is an overreach re:trump.
So the argument is completely watered down at this point.
Time for the adults to put the liberal insurrectionists where they belong. Behind bars.
Not sorry.
Liberal CBS, in trying to spin the narrative to make Trump look bad, explained the National Guard has “not been aiding LAPD in the riots” and “has only been defending federal agents in doing their jobs” and “defending federal buildings.”
Seems the overreach narrative has no legs.
I’m shocked.
