Subnostr

Hmm, and how about when you forward payments?

As I see, even when we pay to a lightning address, we create an invoice on the fly and pay that. When we pay an invoice, we pay that price, + the routing fee. This way who created the invoice will receive the amount fully.

But, if we have a node in the center, we create an invoice to that, we pay that + fees, then the node creates an invoice to the end address, then it pays. Is it possible from the nodes perspective to send all the received sats in a way that it includes the fees?

The Fishcake (nostr.build) 2y ago

Anything that is acting as a proxy will have to pay the fees. Unless there is a direct channel between the node that acts as a proxy and a receiver’s node.

You can probably also do it one the fly, I think lnproxy does something like that! 🐶🐾🫡

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Code & Psychology ⚡️ 2y ago

Paying fees is not a problem. I use the channels, I have to pay.

I am only thinking if it is possible to send forward the received sats in a way, that the invoice + the fees add up to the original amount received. No remaining sats on the wallet.

The Fishcake (nostr.build) 2y ago

Take a look at https://github.com/lnproxy/lnproxy ! Since I never had to do that, I can’t say for sure. Also, see how amboss is doing it for Magma. 🐶🐾🫡