This is common in any field involving designing algorithms, tools, or rules/laws.

The group of people effected by or using the end product is often very different from the people building the product, and they don't do effective market research or quality management to make up for that, so the result misses the mark.

It's also not an answer to just "have hiring diversity" because, for example, having a woman on the team doesn't mean they will be any good at empathizing with other women. Maybe they just have a political ax to grind or are socially inept, so adding them to the team makes the result worse, instead of better.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzphtxf40yq9jr82xdd8cqtts5szqyx5tcndvaukhsvfmduetr85ceqqs9qprqycthk6yv80lwl8qj3m84726p4vdscs70vx2vul9gthjfc8s86crn6

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Let's just be honest: we need normie devs with social skills and diverse life experiences on these projects, instead of the "basement-hackers collaborating with social-justice-warriors" selection we have now.

But the normie devs tend to live someplace like San Antonio or San Marcos, not San Francisco. And that is why we can't have nice things.