>effectively blocking its implementation via a soft fork.

Is it true? #Asknostr

As far as I know, softfork makes more strict rules. Previous valid transactions are invalid under softforked rules. So the softfork doesn't make chain split and old nodes handle softforked transactions as valid transactions. I don't understand how

to block softfork like bikechain🤔

Anyway, I don't agree with this "proof by enforcing chain split". If we impose chain split for every softfork bip, we won't improve anything.

I think that let them destroy themselves and mocking them is the best way to defeat bikechain. nostr:note1ewu9d0jhgh9zhkx4tpfqgfc4prx6qjrj0r9f0p6az4fnuezn474qkll97x