I helped develop the "nuclear power" of digital health. It can be used for the good and for the bad. You can criticize the political use of it, but the tech is beautifully private and freedom-enhancing.
You should be targeting your government, which no tech can protect you against, not the tech.
Vaccine credentials are inherently political. They are issued by states or their authorized agents, and they are demanded by states or their agents. They cannot be “freedom-enhancing”, no matter how you spin it. I think you are mistaking “freedom” for “comfort”.
Like i said, you think there is only bad politics to it. Which is fine. Just take it up with your government. Not with people that design the tech.
I prefer to work with people that are using it for good, like being able to move my records from doctor A to doctor B without the gov or other corporations knowing about it. You could not do that until just 2 years ago.
The only way to fight tyranny tech is with freedom tech. Fight fire with fire. That’s why Bitcoin is the best defense against CBDCs. Something that gold bugs need to understand.
I can’t see how vaccine passports could be good politics in any way. Just as I can’t see how IBM’s “tech” enhanced freedom during the holocaust.
To be clear, I’m not objecting the “tech” nor moving records from doctor A to doctor B. I’m objecting the normalization of vaccine credentials/passports.
You are free to do as you please. I’m free to voice my objections publicly. I think it’s important to address the issues with vaccine passports in the public conversation. If we lose sovereignty over our bodies, no “tech” can save us.
