Houses will tend to decline in nominal terms, under a Bitcoin standard. All assets do. You'd almost always be underwater on a mortagage.

Rent-to-own is unattractive for landlords, when house prices rise, because it's easier to find a renter to pay more. Under asset-price deflation, the next renter would pay less.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I agree that rent-to-own is silly when goods and asset prices rise, interest rates are low, and debt is easy to discharge.

Under the gold standard, the value of a house declined over time due to depreciation. In those conditions, it was uncommon to see home loans with terms longer than 5 years. This prevented people from being underwater for the most part.

Home loans were generally uncommon.