So, I deeply sympathise with anarchocapitalism. But I have never read or heard a serious critique of it by somebody who actually knows what it is. What do you think about anarchocapitalism?
#anarchy #anarchocapitalism #socialism #brainstorm
So, I deeply sympathise with anarchocapitalism. But I have never read or heard a serious critique of it by somebody who actually knows what it is. What do you think about anarchocapitalism?
#anarchy #anarchocapitalism #socialism #brainstorm
Agorism is more consistent than anarchocapitalism
Very weird statement: They are extremely compatible, the biggest difference is probably that Anarcho Capitalism is the end goal and Agorism is the way to get there in a still statist world. It's like saying 'boiling water is more consistent than the soup'. Both ways you need one for the other.
This (screenshot) is actually a good description about Anarcho Capitalism in a statist world (obviously if the state is gone it's not a black / gray market anymore).
The part that comes after it is B.S. IMO. That Anarcho Capitalism accepts political strategies is just not true. It literally describes how human interaction would work under 'capitalism without rulers'. That some libertarian thinkers who call themselves Ancap believe they can use political strategies to get there, has nothing to do with Anarcho Capitalism itself.

Just adding "ism" seems to box in whatever ideal being described. I like just anarchy "without a ruler". Without a ruler of course the market will be free. Also capitalism is now associated with what America supposedly is which is far from a free market, like what Anarcocapitalist define capitalism.