I think you need to look at what you wrote here and expand the category of Genocide to American slavery because it fits your stated definition. There were plenty of death labor camps during American slavery and Native American slavery.
nostr:npub160ed0rgndfqggfnn2vmqwjuvxan6h6d6dul2x6arq2f3p0qwnvfqqnc04e
1. Slaves are not free: the require food, water, and shelter.
2. Therefor, every slaver in history took on slaves believing they would get a return on said food, water, and shelter.
3. Slavery that doesn't follow the above criteria, for example in death labor camps, is actually called genocide.
Discussion
Sure, as there were death labor camps in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia.
Genocide is also a permant fixture of human societies.
but but if you point that out their little bailey is not so important and they will attack you for that.
Little bailey?
manipulation technique based on a logical fallacy called "motte and bailey". always constructed in similar ways as "antifascist".
how could you not be against the nazis? then you must be for
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy
the bailey is the real position, which is in fact - in the case of antifascism, communism. the thing they hold up in its place to argue about is fighting nazis.
same applies to the antislavery, because what they are really defending is bankster slavery (most of them don't even know it) and they present their pet strawman, slavery of africans by white (ie german and english) people. you can't even break through the fact that they never talk about the pale skinned slaves who were almost as common, the irish.