I know what youve said, and thats all Im responding too. Maybe youre not self-aware enough to see the patterns of your socialist rhetoric, but its easy for people that know what theyre talking about to see
Discussion
Go and eat some money then, let me know how it tastes đ¤Ł
You clearly didnt learn anything. But that would require you to learn something new and question the propaganda youve been fed
It isnt easy
I suggest Human Action by Ludwig Von Mises
Sounds like the doggo happened to have taken the Mark of the Beast, and is blinded by Socialism, which was created by a Jesuit.
That's what my producer, nostr:nprofile1qy28wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytn00p68ytnyv4mqz9nhwden5te0dehhxarjv4kxjar9wvhx7un8yqqzpkdr9xh6hvnr4zhjz6pcadz7ruzvcvqqwpzxf9rufwg8uxl0tqxhxjfxyc, seems to think.
If it sounds like it's obeying the Pope, it's probably taking the Mark of the Beast on the right hand.
Sokio was correct on the matter.
Nevertheless, there is more Unix-nature in one line of shell script than there is in ten thousand lines of C. It seems at least two distinct conversations are happening here, despite the parties treating them as one. Would you describe a need to literally fight another man for food as indicative of civilization? I think not. Your interlocutors, are they proposing socialism as an alternative? Not here, they arenât. Throwing punches has its place, but I advance the possibility that you gentlemen will come to realize you are in fact approaching the same problem from different angles, rather than from different armies.
Well worded, but if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then its probably a duck
Approaching the same problem from different angles is exactly what socialists do, but they dont have the understanding about the monetary system to really get what theyre talking about
Its all slogans and sentiment. No logic
I donât think they are solving the same problem, no, though they may say so, even believe so; once we move beyond appearances, see how their trees inevitably grow, the fruits they inevitably bear, mere variations in perspective simply cannot account for half of it; still, and so much for well worded, âgoalâ would have been a better choice to convey my meaning, though you might not consider it much of an improvement. My point remains, however; I donât think youâre saying what they seem to think youâre sayingâand vice-versa. As to duck typing, it may work in programming (the debate rages on), but it is lacking when it comes to honest dialogue or logicâand, ironically enough, âmoves like a duck, quacks like a duck,â pretty much describes Che Guevaraâs approach to sending people to the paredĂłn.