Like it or not, #Trezor #Coinjoin is the best solution out there!

Catchy name, right, #plebs?

I finally submitted my 4 and half pages long article about this controversial feature of Trezor's cold wallets.

I would like you to read it, share it and subscribe to my Substack! It's free - I let you, my fellow #nostr #plebs decide if it has any added value since this is our way in #Nostr space.

Here is one quote of myself I think packs a punch:

"There is no real issue to use chain-analysis prior to coinjoin as it was already present. The real reason why we do coinjoins is to clear the history for further use." ...and Trezor is doing a fantastic job I might add.

Now go read that article about #Bitcoin privacy. Enjoy!

https://frantisekmarek.substack.com/p/like-it-or-not-trezor-coinjoin-is

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Výborný článek!

I just realized it would make more sense to answer in English, so:

Great article, thank you!

Thank you very much - I saw you even reposted on Twitter. And many thanks for a gerenous #zap, it is much appreciated.

good article :)

Thanks! Would appreciate any feedback about format, writing - and please consider a subscribe, it’s free. :)

And hey, thanks for the #zap!

Excellent article, clear, easy to read.

I'll just add what I already wrote in another thread. It is the ability to safely and easily use CoinJoin on a massive scale (and I believe that thanks to the implementation in Trezor its use will not remain marginal) that should be used to clean up the history of just even "tainted bitcoins". Why?

Because:

1. no one can be sure that such bitcoins will not get to him

2. unfortunately, no one knows who will decide which bitcoins are "tainted bitcoins" in the future.

Anyway, this first step that Trezor has taken is a step in the right direction. Let's move forward together on this journey to better privacy!