42 is 40 + 2 opcodes (which are counted in the current versions)
If you think Core gets to just dictate things, get over your centralization mindset.
Knots has used 40/42 since 2013. Samourai are the ones who chose to exceed it.
42 is 40 + 2 opcodes (which are counted in the current versions)
If you think Core gets to just dictate things, get over your centralization mindset.
Knots has used 40/42 since 2013. Samourai are the ones who chose to exceed it.
πππ§‘π
Seems this is not a mistake, nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m π¬
More custom node rules will come up, some aligned with business requirements and/or idiology. I think it's fine, thats what decentralization and consensus is about.
nostr:note13uuza6wxv5wukq0uclx30geg9au4nzayq9dhj7c8y3cvfjqfnvwqav970d
I mean yeah, but in the end it won't be an issue if it wasn't affecting the limited capacity Bitcoin users have to generate private transactions using something like whirlpool.
I wouldn't be surprised if In a few years to run a node you would choose between Core/ Ocean/Synonym node versions.
nostr:note1rnpulvz9hstd8r7a7hfy7v7uh8arnr7yr5mq6vq9cy0em20dsdxqjw5py9