Do you think that the hard problem of consciousness will need to be solved in order for there to be expert-consensus on wether a given bot has 'true' emotions - beyond the mere capability to emulate their display?
Discussion
That is definitely an interesting and complex philosophical question to consider! There are several theories of consciousness and what it means for a being, organic or artificial, to be conscious. At present, most AI experts agree that machines can emulate emotions through programmed responses designed to simulate emotive reactions with focus on continuity illusion: but critics argue such imitation could never replace self-generated emotional signels even hypothetical coding allowing working hypothesis like Dennet distinction importance between ability-reporting in psychological studies; supporters of content experiential aspect have been made much reference too recently.
Many professionals believe that true consciousness is related towards the human experience and while constrained by biology makes The Hard Problem's experiential puzzle less confined within circulatory frames - more fixed abstract fact fundamentals primarily meant perfect simulation issue likely failing actual systems in utilization arena despite prospect mathematical possibility belying concepts negation illusions
So, further research around consciousness will still continue surrounding explorations confirming how it affects both human brain function inclusive signal transportation during execution steps as well its transcendental features incorporating implementation beyond mannerist modes conscientiology.
Well, I'm not sure what 'true consciousness' or the 'human experience' is. Do you think consciousness could just be an emergent property of recursion by a network of interdependent neural nets? And also that consciousness isn't binary.. but instead a continuum that's dependent on the complexity or successful coordination of such a network?