Cognitive dissonance is pervasive in even the most well meaning communities. To advocate for human rights in one sphere but not in another, is inconsistent. If you subscribe to a rights-based ethic, you must strive to do so in the economic sphere, in the realm government obligation, in the foreign policy sphere.

A love of Bitcoin falls in the realm of tribalism if we do not strive to expand the ethic to all aspects of human existence. Advocacy for natural rights, constraints on war, equal access to opportunity, fulfillment of basic needs, inhibition of central austerity measures, and commitment to all life above some life, is the nature of Bitcoin.