Nostr

Hardware wallet that has secure element and a vulnerability is discovered on the secure element:

- throw the hardware wallet in the trash

Hardware wallet that does not have secure element and a vulnerability is discovered:

- just upgrade

I also find it curious the defense of the secure element and at the same time defend the open source, the current secure element are not open source and less open hardware.

nostr:note170j38s2n6hh6xm0y5s75cvmyv8qmqnx7aj568e24g9lkvt6n46jsnj0t6h

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

cadayton 1y ago

I think you mean the successor to Truecrypt which is Veracrypt.

Bitcoin and Cold Storage using Veracrypt.

https://nosl.ink/tR-ytGP6)

Cyph3rp9nk 1y ago

I was referring specifically to the fact that I know of no exploited vulnerabilities in Truecrypt/Veracrypt and a few in bitlocker when using the TPM chip which has an architecture similar to a secure element.

Cyph3rp9nk 1y ago

Truecrypt/Veracrypt and LUKS are superior in all respects to the model used by hardware-dependent bitlocker.