Replying to Avatar Michael Matulef

For any capital accumulation to occur, individuals must lower their time preference; they must reduce their discounting of the future enough to provide for it at the expense of the present. This point is worth bearing in mind when economic illiterates rail against capital owners for being parasites on the workers. The sacrifice of present consumption by capital owners in exchange for future reward is economically no different from the sacrifice of leisure by workers in exchange for future reward. Had capital owners actually contributed nothing to the production process, then their consumption of the capital good instead of offering it to the workers would make no difference to the workers' productivity. But ask any worker what would happen to their productivity without capital, and the absurdity of hating capital becomes apparent.

- nostr:npub1gdu7w6l6w65qhrdeaf6eyywepwe7v7ezqtugsrxy7hl7ypjsvxksd76nak

Avatar
₿logging₿itcoin 2y ago

The main problem is that workers wages are ephemeral capital. Low time preference is beaten out of workers by Central Bank rulers.

They work all day for bullshit pay, come home and drink their troubles away while watching propoganda on TV. Politics has devulged to petty name calling. Bllame orange man, weekend at Biden's, and greedy corporations.

People don't notice **the people in charge of the FED remain the same no matter which idiot you vote for**.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.