i never used social media to post fake-happy in shit relationships.
in fact, i specifically avoided it. and i wrote a diary instead.
π±
i never used social media to post fake-happy in shit relationships.
in fact, i specifically avoided it. and i wrote a diary instead.
π±
trying to anticipate, suppress, and control everything for "safety" is unrealistic.
that is fascism.
education, conversation, community, diversity expand awareness so flexibility becomes a superpower. if you recognize patterns, you are less anxious and upset. anxiety stems from the panic of not knowing what you are experiencing.
safety bubbles breed insecurity with ignorance and suppression.
wild and free in a library.
π±
πΈβ¬οΈ instagram:
i am having fun with my new instagram account.
i have never used meta other than 1 lame anon facebook account in the twenty teens to follow gardening tips, and another for about 5 days in 2021 to doxx a stalker. π
i think i might stay for a while and see what's what.
π±
i see algorithms differently.
apparently. lmao.
(note: diana is the default offering because she was the original epstein/laurel high level plant, and when the epstein code base was lifted at harvard for facebook, it was imbedded in the baseline).
π»β¬οΈ "the cyber":
i think if everyone is making something original, it seems fine. the problem with zombie protocols using click bait is the unseen shadow tags stick to the id when the actor or situation or plot is picked up with likes and reposts etc. if you are already struggling with a metastasised identity because of snitch tags and permissionless shadow links, you need to unfollow random name rec and return to manual driving for likes etc. it clears up quickly if you notice the cult content push. multiple users on your account or historical use literally does not matter if you retool what you feed the algorithm about yourself. stop acting scared of snack delivery.
πͺβ¬οΈ circus:
l.m.f.a.o. -
in the yard when i dropped of my daughter this afternoon. ποΈπ¬
(note: i still do not have cancer.).
π« -