I suppose I am, and I guess my question is this: in a dog eat dog world (which is quite a natural state of existence, if we can draw anything from history) what is the incentive for people to act in accordance with agoristic principles? Surely the game can be won by the one who is willing to break the rules, and we all know those people exist right?

What are the prevailing conditions which would create a scenario in which it is the most beneficial for everyone to follow voluntary ideals? And disincentivise those who are willing to take advantage of others for their own gain?

I would love this kind of future, I simply struggle to visualize it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Anarchism in the form of voluntary agorism does not require mass adoption to work. It simply requires one individual to decide to live freely, transact voluntarily with his / her neighbors, and ignore the state and all of its cruel, stupid, and unjust enforcements (or at least, only be as law-abiding up to the point as to avoid getting thrown in a cage or murdered).

nostr:note1rhttff2jeq64wgf5meta6hekrt9ksf00kc86c00ngeu5f6jggjfqj7u7q7