That's not the point though. With mandatory 2FA hackers will find another way and unless it was total recklessness of the customer, this precedent seems to mean the custodian may be on the hook.
nostr:npub1s6z7hmmx2vud66f3utxd70qem8cwtggx0jgc7gh8pqwz2k8cltuqrdwk4c But the cost for the custodian wouldn’t increase much if they make 2FA mandatory. Which would be a win/win for both parties.
For larger amounts self custody is the preferred option of course.
That's not the point though. With mandatory 2FA hackers will find another way and unless it was total recklessness of the customer, this precedent seems to mean the custodian may be on the hook.
No replies yet.