You’re projecting here

NTs are typically thrilled to be presented with information that challenges their beliefs. And if it can’t be verified immediately they have no problem saying “that’s interesting - I’d have to look into that”. If the logic is bad, they have no problem saying “I’m not sure I follow your logic” and know it won’t offend or cause conflict with another NT. I can’t tell you how many people I have calmly listened to tell me things I disagree with.

It’s the S and F types who get emotional about being presented information that conflicts with their beliefs, because of the reasons I mention in the video. Abstract concepts without direct application to the world that could bring them into conflict with other people offend them. They have to reject information they can’t accept because accepting new information that breaks with the group is tantamount to an inducement to follow you now, instead of the group. Which is a crazy ask

SFs are fans of “trusted sources” and “experts” because they’re a reasonably good heuristic to follow when the world is largely unknowable by a single mind