Nostr Web Client

The misconduct allegations have been around for 20+ years, but the retractions and resignation of Stanford's president are a direct consequence of the recent investigation of the Stanford Daily 1/3

https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/

KANTAROT.MK 2y ago

Stanford dragged its feet, but publishers should have acted sooner. Maybe mainstream media will follow in the footsteps of the Stanford Daily and do more investigative journalism about scientific misconduct. 2/3

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

KANTAROT.MK 2y ago

Yes, retractions look bad, but academic journals need to take responsibility. Sitting on this information for 20+ years and hoping it blows over is a big reason why the faith in journals is decreasing.

3/3