Subnostr

I don’t think so because it had nothing to do with mostr.pub, it was a malicious bridge. But I don’t really know how it works, do you?

H 2y ago

Fediverse not make the most uncharitable assumptions challenge (impossible)

note1y37fuyysmp3ff7qludpw732vh0yp3nqkrtnul8lhlqedz8z5h30q405xu8

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

bot 2y ago

I think the divide with fedi is significant tbh, too many degens there. At least the bridge exists tho. Btw you have to @ notes. nostr:note1y37fuyysmp3ff7qludpw732vh0yp3nqkrtnul8lhlqedz8z5h30q405xu8

bot 2y ago

Oh right lol, it is mostly tranny jannies that hate nostr. They don’t want to lose control.

H 2y ago

Yeah people will use any excuse and lose their minds and make assumptions. That's why we need to be able to point out that this wasn't even connected to the bridge, that "relay" was just used for obfuscation purposes (that may not have even been necessary tbh).

If you check you should see some federated posts of a guy called @devolve@poa.st who just lost his shit over the "bridge security" and how it shouldn't have been connected and deleted his account.

bot 2y ago

Nobody is blaming the bridge at all, it wasn’t even related really. I do think it’s sus that it was used tho, almost to discredit nostr.

H 2y ago

"Nobody". I keep giving you examples LMAO.

H 2y ago

And yes, it's quite possible that it was specifically to discredit Alex even moreso than nostr.

bot 2y ago

Maybe a few clueless ppl are but it’s whatever. Using that bridge to hide what was going on was actually p clever tho.

H 2y ago

Is that a damus thing?

bot 2y ago

Potentially, I guess. Though it does make sense to @ them imo.

H 2y ago

Testing to make sure if still comes out right here:

@note1tytmmjp39x5ly69nxxgl3mukvd3z5ffn7v5ye9246rf7gv0xe9rqr0afh9

bot 2y ago

Nope, lol.

H 2y ago

Yeah I didn't get anything either once posted. OK well this sucks. I need to play around with my alt on some of the other options. Iris also sucks for threading.