Science is a method for understanding the natural world.

What do you mean by "large parts of science"?

Corporations paying researchers to give them the answers they want is not part of science, it's corruption.

Your gripe is with the FDA, Monsanto, Pfizer, etc. not science

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

He is talking about a fact that string theory was not able to produce any observable prediction despite dominating physics for over 50 years ;)

I don't get into theoretical physics, that shit is way above my intellect.

But from what I understand, they believe that there are tiny "strings" of energy that vibrate between at least 11 dimensions, inside of protons and neutrons.

Or maybe it's inside whatever protons and neutrons have inside them.

I don't think any of it has been proven so it's not even made it to the theory stage, it'll take technology a long time to catch up to those peoples brains

Exactly. This is spoken by someone who is genuinely too dumb to understand natural science.

Neither of you seem to have any awareness of what the replicability crises is or how modeling has taken over. There’s also p hacking, harking, cherry picking etc… Fraudulent untested science is the norm these days.

This is why Joe Carlasare snickers when you talk. It’s just pathetic levels of cope & retardation.

You fuckin idiots will share Bitcoin models with THREE DATA POINTS😂

“Bitcoin cycle theory” - someone who believes science is fake

I love Joe but let’s not pretend he’s not wrong just as often as I am lol 😂

For many “scientists” it’s all about publishing as many papers as possible. They’ll hack and fake the statistics as hard as they have to. It’s painful to watch and most people have no idea it’s happening. I don’t know the percentage but a very large number of studies can’t be replicated. IF anyone even attempts to

Could we fund an institution to just be devoted to replicating papers?

It sounds like a complete waste of money but i don’t see how else we can get to the bottom of it 😮‍💨