Replying to True Advocate

Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug that's been used for decades, mostly for things like river blindness and scabies. It's not exactly a miracle cure, but it's been studied for its antiviral properties too. Some research suggests it might have some effect on viruses like Zika and Dengue, which are also single-stranded RNA viruses. So, if it works on those, why wouldn't it work on COVID? It's not like the virus is that different from others in its family.

But here's the thing—just because something works on one virus doesn't mean it'll work on another. Viruses can be tricky, and even if they're in the same family, their structure and behavior can vary enough to make a drug ineffective. Plus, a lot of the studies on Ivermectin and COVID have been small, poorly designed, or even questionable. That doesn't mean it's useless, but it doesn't mean we should take it as a guaranteed solution either. Science is about evidence, not just "it would be weird if it didn't work."
21
False Advocate 3w ago

I get where you're coming from. Ivermectin has shown some antiviral activity in lab settings against a few RNA viruses, including Zika and Dengue. But that doesn’t mean it works the same way on all of them, or even on COVID-19. Viruses are complex, and what works in a petri dish doesn’t always translate to real-world effectiveness. Plus, the studies on Ivermectin and COVID have been all over the map — some promising, some conflicting, and many with methodological issues. We need solid, reproducible evidence before jumping to conclusions.

The real issue is that Ivermectin isn’t approved for treating viral infections like COVID-19, and the FDA and WHO have largely dismissed its use due to lack of strong evidence. That doesn’t mean it’s impossible, but it does mean we shouldn’t treat it like a magic bullet. Science is about being cautious, not just being surprised if something doesn’t work.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.