You know, I don't even disagree, but you ignored every point I made and every question I asked.

It is important to understand why #monero exists. Unless you have a total fiat mindset and only care about NGU.

You don't have to hodl it, you don't even have to use it, but if you don't even understand why it exists and why people use it and sing its praises, you just come across as ignorant.

This used to be self-evident in the old days. Every other BTC OG I know knows, uses and respects Monero. But now the people who get it are lost in a sea of noise, and the fact that the bitcoin maxis are rewarded monetarily doesn't help, they confirm their biases as their bags get heavier.

And if you really stop and think that through, that's a superficial fiat mindset, nothing more.

The argument for #monero is technical and philosophical, not ngu.

As Bitcoin used to be. As it still is for some people.

But Bitcoin lacks a critical property on the L1, and Monero covers that lack nicely.

And sure, you may argue it's better this way because of reliability, which I personally disagree with, but not entirely. And anyway, at this point it would be too big a change to introduce in Bitcoin.

So, guess what.

Two tools, and they complement each other. I use both for different purposes, and yes, I use LN too.

To outright dismiss something as powerful as Monero (L1 fungible digital cash) is narrow-minded. Just as narrow-minded as the normies who dismiss Bitcoin without understanding it.

And maybe more, because you guys ought to know better.