https://www.peterkreeft.com/topics-more/personhood_apple.htm
Discussion
That is a very longwinded argument that doesn't actually respond to my question. If you actually read your argument, it says "clearly, involuntary euthanasia is wrong," even though that's exactly what I've been challenging. What is wrong with involuntary euthanasia? What is wrong with murder? Do you have an answer?
Involuntary euthanasia (I assume this means someone in a coma who will not wake up again, for example) ≠ abortion
Involuntary euthanasia without a will or prior agreement is an ethical dilemma, it will always clash with some principle… similar situations can occur with abortion… debating why murder is wrong is unnecessary
I read the article about two years ago, I don't remember how euthanasia is handled in the article
Bro I'm just quoting your article back at you. Your own article directly presents involuntary euthanasia as an equivalent to abortion. If you expect other people to read the shit you post then you should at the very least read it yourself to make sure you understand it and that it's actually relevant. Ever heard of the golden rule? Real dick move to waste people's time like that.
God, behavior like this is why I hate evidence. You will never catch me using evidence to support my arguments.
Also, really convenient of you to sweep the entire argument under the rug, saying it's "unnecessary". You say it will always clash with "some principle", but you refuse to endorse even a single one. I can't possibly figure out your perspective unless you share your reasoning.