It's amazingly cringe arguing with non-developers about why ceasing work on the base Bitcoin protocol is retarded rather than a genius way to eliminate risk.
Is someone prominent arguing against maintenance?
Please Login to reply.
Allegedly Saylor
Can some uncucked fucker with a mic just ask him next ball licking podcast?
Ah, a poet among us. But you right. Just ask and stop speculating
Wise words
Allegedly. Or perhaps he thinks it's a bad idea for trad-fi to fund core devs.
Trad Fi is funding the Human Rights Foundation and Open Sats
For very specific reasons, I am sure. Number one is to keep HRF's eyes away from the human rights abuses in the US "democracy."
What maintenance needs to be done?
General software maintenance. Like the 2038 problem for example.
