It's valuable to the operator in scamming the user by making them think the trust is distributed. That is it's usecase.

If you want to claim its useful for scamming the regulator, that's fair, but don't pretend its any better than single party custody to users.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

So you're saying that if I buy some ecash token I don't need the guardians to sign to trade back to sats?

No, in saying the guardians can't stop the seller from rugging you.