Replying to Avatar jb55

The only "risk" I can see is if I don't have liquidity in the direction of the users wallet, but that can be easily managed by opening channels, which I should probably be doing more anyways.

Benefits:

- I don't have to custody peoples funds, avoiding many legal issues

- users are encouraged to melt their gems for real bitcoin when they want to zap. This can be done automatically as well.

- avoids the UX complexity of ecash and nut zaps

- provides a neat way to get non KYC sats via the appstore and facilitated by our node.

I think its a pretty swell idea if I don't say so myself. i don't think its too legally dubious 😅

nostr:note1tnmuwvu2a4ycktpvgd0ag7npvkpc8akuewln63pj6mztkan4gc8qztfqqy

Avatar
Lebanese Hodl 10mo ago

Definitely not legally dubious 😁💎

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.