Government shouldn't be involved in healthcare at all. Markets will handle it.
Discussion
Markets will handle healthcare? We couldn't disagree more...
But anyway if you have a successful example, i'll take it...
You're still operating in a fiat mindset. That will shift certainly over time as you're on this platform more. These conversations will be had in how Bitcoin will end up affecting this industry in the long term.
If bitcoin doesn't start being used for everyday transactions, it will never affect many things. Right now fiat currencies rule and i know quite a few economics.
Wrong mindset.
Maybe, but what is wrong with it? There has to be an argument...
Nostr is built on the same principles as Bitcoin. Freedom tech. Sound money. If you don't understand it I would start looking into it as it's pretty much the biggest topic around here.
The Bitcoin Standard by Saifedean Ammous
Broken Money by Lyn Alden
Those are great books to start. They'll start to show you why Bitcoin is the answer to the terrible money we are currently using.
For me nostr is a decentralised protocol for communications. It's not like bitcoin.
I am aware of the books you mentioned and it is true that i didn't read them so far. I will, i hope soon, start to read Lyn Alden's book. So that's a fair point. I don't think that i will be convinced that bitcoin is the answer to fiat money though. For me bitcoin is an asset with value, as long as there are people who believe it has value, but... I think that if it doesn't start to be used for everyday transactions, it will deflate at some point after the last halving and with a big chance to deflate till zero. If it does start being used for everyday transactions, it will need regulation at some point just like the fiat money need, and since there is not such authority... It will deflate, with a big chance to deflate till zero...
Bitcoin is a decentralized money, which is a form of communication.
You should definitely look into the "What is Money" Podcast. You'll learn a lot.
I have already a mooc from university of nicosia about bitcoin my friend.
You say i'll learn a lot. Fine... Maybe i'll learn a lot. Maybe nothing. Maybe others will learn a lot from me. So, it would be good if there were arguments to what you say. Why, for example, do you say i would learn a lot, like you have the wisdom? Give me an example or something on what you disagree. You have read the books you mentioned , you have heard the podcast, according to you you have learned a lot, at least something. So far i don't see real arguments. The only arguement so far was that healthcare in USA is not private, despite the fact that everything is owned by the private sector, because there are regulations from the state, which is complete nonsense. Sorry if i don't sound polite on this, but i can't find other words to describe it.
I've suspected for some time that you're a bot account but now you've confirmed it. It looks to me like you're attempting to monopolize my attention with an overly complicated discussion that ultimately won't go anywhere so I'll be disengaging from you and blocking your account.
Your counter argument to mine is semantics and to call it nonsense. Government regulatory control to the degree finance and healthcare are controlled in the US effectively removes the benefits of private systems. To call it technically private does not negate that fact. Your points are weak and no one cares about your mooc from University of Nicosia. Markets and reality trump your appeal to authority.
You can argue that regulatory control by the state removes some benefit of private systems. That's an argument finally. Can you give us an example please?
I don't care either if you don't care about the mooc. I was answering on someone else.
Regulations are a reality too. And you will live with them.
Your points are more than weak. They are nonsense. You have only one argument so far, without explaining it.