Nostr Web Client

all I know is that he said FAFO. I don't know if he said it was an act of war. I don't think it was an act of war. Also, when was the last time they actually went through the constitutional process for matters of war (I don't think it should be that way, I'm just saying). Lastly, to answer my own question and invalidate your original statement, the constitution applies to domestic affairs and not international ones

The Daniel 🖖 6d ago

Nothing is invalidated. Even Bush went to Congress for consent in Iraq. He lied to get it, obviously. Now the president doesn’t even bother to do that, which is authoritarian by nature.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

William ₿ Travis 6d ago

Congress has abdicated its role. That's not the president's fault.

The Daniel 🖖 6d ago

I don’t think one negates the other.

William ₿ Travis 6d ago

Sure it does. If Congress doesn't care to do its job, and the people don't care to hold them to it, the republic is over.

The Daniel 🖖 6d ago

Congress not holding the president accountable is also an example of losing our Constitution.

William ₿ Travis 6d ago

It sure does. But that happened once the bureaucratic "expert" class was created.

hopium 6d ago

again, not an act of war

The Daniel 🖖 6d ago

I’m not one to give the Feds the benefit of the doubt.

hopium 6d ago

i agree with you on one thing, that was a very boring conversation. But you insist on consistently making false, idealistic, and fantastical claims so i wanted to call that out