6/12
This operated under the presumption that you are always online.
Which is not that crazy, considering you would if you were mining plus most p2p applications operate like this.
Think Bittorrent.
So this is a disadvantage vs an addresses, when you don't need to be online.
7/12
The truth is that the pros were heavily outweighed by the cons.
IP is a terrible identifier for an entity.
Also starting around 2009 static IP usage was less and less.
Never mind that IP leaking has privacy drawbacks.
8/12
Man in The Middle Attacks.
There was no authentication method when using Pay-to-IP, so someone could intercept the communication and switch up with their own public key.
Nvm this traffic was not encrypted, but this kinda has always been a thing in Bitcoin.🥲
9/12
Something that always bothered me is calling #Bitcoin addresses, addresses instead of invoices.
"Invoice" is more descriptive, and discourages address reuse.
But we can see now where the name came from.
IP address -> Bitcoin address.
10/12
Even though there were some plans to improve this by Satoshi, this never happened and it got removed.
In the end the cons severely outweigh the pros and it just made more sense to build such functionalities outside of Bitcoin.
11/12
Some current ideas that offer some of the pros of Pay-to-IP:
- BIP47 - Reusable Payment Codes
- BIP78- PayJoin
- BIP352 - Silent Payments
(interesting all 3 are privacy focused)
BTCPayServer being the most mature fruition of the vision behind Pay-to-IP.
12/12
Thanks for reading and like & retweet, if you liked it. :D
Follow for more Bitcoin facts like this every day!
From now also here on nostr :P
And the #BitcoinFactOfTheDay was brought to you by BitBox !🇨ðŸ‡ðŸ”‘
