Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar BitcoinIsFuture

Pieter Wuille says "data storage through other means is already possible (including through ways that are cheaper than through OP_RETURN)"

Core is completely captured and their actions speak vlolumes.

Core devs deliberately allowed inscriptions spam by rejecting Luke's fix in 2024.

They are now using that as excuse that "spam can't be reduced" or that "spam already exists on Bitcoin because of inscription spam".

That is dishonest and an internal attack on Bitcoin. Core devs deliberately allow spam and then defend it like shitcoiners.

They also maliciously changed the definition of datacarriersize.

Bitcoin Knots has fixed those issues.

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28408

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29187

https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/127895/implications-of-op-return-changes-in-upcoming-bitcoin-core-version-30-0/127903#127903

nostr:nevent1qqsxwltp636hyjxlff5jp8l3h75frgu8xaeh8yc09hu59k79c4rq70gpzpmhxue69uhkumewwd68ytnrwghszrnhwden5te0dehhxtnvdakz7qgswaehxw309ahx7um5wghx6mmd9udkyk4a

Avatar
nomadshiba⚡ 3mo ago

as an addition:

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29769

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
nomadshiba⚡ 3mo ago

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/fc06881f13495154c888a64a38c7d538baf00435/src/policy/policy.h#L46-L47

Thread collapsed