"someone gave some money to someone to develop a decentralized messaging protocol and that someone follows or followed someone who thought some bad things"

Meanwhile people living under actual fascist regimes today are using that protocol to document human rights abuses.

Because their messages cannot be censored - unlike on Bluesky, Mastodon, or corporate social media.

Journalistic priorities in full view.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

"someone gave some money to someone to develop a decentralized messaging protocol and that someone follows or followed someone who thought some bad things"

The category error of follows/followed aside

Is that even news worthy?

Is it news worthy enough to justify doxxing someone?

What journalist ethics may apply here?