Subnostr

516add19... 2y ago

Anyone else not see a problem charging money for X? I mean, a company is allowed to make these decisions. Its not unethical at all. It's their choice. This doesnt affect free speech at all..

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nobody 2y ago

I agree, if it weren't just about the money, but it's more about having everyone's credit cards on file so they know exactly who you are.

puddintaine2 2y ago

🎯 and this poster is trying to make it about something else. Glad you called it out…

nobody 2y ago

No, MC4 is very smart and I agree that any company has a right to charge money to use they're services, but that's not all they are trying to do

puddintaine2 2y ago

You seem triggered.

516add19... 2y ago

Youre absolutely right. Its a data grab! 💯

nobody 2y ago

Yeah, they say it's to "eliminate bots" but that's just an excuse

puddintaine2 2y ago

Oops, I loved this simping sycophantic comment by accident.

nobody 2y ago

Bro chill out and leave mc4 alone. You can disagree with what he said but don't go calling him a simping sycopath

puddintaine2 2y ago

Quote me where I called him a name. I’ll wait.

matata 2y ago

it's not about the money, but the payment rails and other inferred identify sata that exposes your governmental identity

matata 2y ago

identify sata = identity data*

nobody 2y ago

sucking power is not equivalent to free speech

go to you literal town square and start blah blahing

516add19... 2y ago

Exactly. We are not entitled to X

Financial Parasites 2y ago

KYC is the problem here.

516add19... 2y ago

Well if someone doesnt want KYC why use twitter then?

Financial Parasites 2y ago

They shouldn’t. KYC is just one of the many problems with platforms like X.