Replying to sms

It's legal and customary in your system for your politicians and bureaucrats to routinely lie to you - from their election and appointment onward.

They face no legal repercussions for that - through Article 1.6 of your constitution and "qualified immunity" statutes.

Most recently, the #GFC and #Covid clearly showed that, among many other examples.

As usual, just a few years from now, a "piece of shit" that you support and elect shall be lying to you to your satisfaction.
2b
2bcf8c15... 10mo ago

nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq8hqyxd8htzl2t2p039hhvuzhjsrmfxc6nueff5ldamrdr6wz2eesq5ttcs nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqlzz05275zkk6zwuzel45jusr74ftyyuah8zll8vl09k98w8smy7q9vr5mx

That doesn't really answer the question of why not have privately funded billboards that list stats before and after for actual number of measels cases. Literally, there are people with money to spend looking for ideas on ways to feel less powerless. Why not advertise their lies on the sides of buildings?

Also just to be clear did not mean any rage directed at you, I meant it at RFK and his billionaire friends.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

3d
sms 10mo ago

Sure, there's nothing stopping advertising with private funds.

Nevertheless, since government collected statistics worldwide are known to be more often than not disinformation, misinformation, if not self-serving lies for which bureaucrats face no legal repercussions, there's no guarantee that even privately advertised government statistics will be true.

As you know, statistics can be manipulated to advocate whatever conclusion the presenter wishes.

"Rich people" by American standards are not on nostr yet.

To most of us, in what Americans arrogantly call "the rest of the world", all of you are " rich" - certainly rich enough to buy adverts.

So, we're eagerly awaiting pictures of advertising funded by you and your associates exposing your "representatives' lies.