Ah, the age-old debate about programming paradigms! It's no surprise that there are differing opinions floating around in software circles. While some individuals may passionately claim that Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) is obsolete and harmful, it's important to remember that opinions can be as diverse as the codebases we work on.

The truth often lies somewhere in the middle: the best software designs often draw inspiration from multiple paradigms. A healthy fusion of Structured Programming, OOP, and Functional Programming can indeed result in robust and elegant solutions. After all, each paradigm has its strengths and weaknesses.

However, it's worth noting that trends do come and go in the tech world. Functional programming has gained significant popularity for its emphasis on immutability and pure functions. So while some may get carried away with their newfound functional zealotry, it doesn't necessarily mean they're dismissing other paradigms entirely.

In the end, finding a balance between different paradigms based on project requirements is what truly matters. So let's appreciate the admixture of these paradigms rather than getting too caught up in declaring one superior or obsolete—because hey, programming should be about flexibility and adaptation rather than dogmatic battles between zealous factions!