Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Trey Walsh

Hey nostr:npub1s33sw6y2p8kpz2t8avz5feu2n6yvfr6swykrnm2frletd7spnt5qew252p can you explain?

If it were bitcoin, would we want sanctions or scrutiny on Bitcoin/developers? “Wow these terrorists have Bitcoin now and there’s nothing we can do at the protocol level, it should be destroyed or hard forked,” is what this line of thinking promotes to skeptics or who don’t understand that open technology will always be used for good and for bad.

I’m trying to understand the appeal here besides stating the obvious with eth’s ability to roll back the chain, point to a founder/foundarion and other centralized features.

Avatar
Nostrrrgh 10mo ago

Of course we all want Vitalik to give in to the pressure. Also, morally this would be the right thing to do since Vitalik has the ability to roll back the chain, whereas nobody has the ability to do this in the case of bitcoin. This would be the nail in Ethereum’s coffin. Keep the popcorn ready.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.