I bet Pavlovski would luv it. the. again: would it be 100% censorship free?
Discussion
🤔 video platforms do seem to be incredibly complicated and costly 🤔 and perhaps most susceptible to bad actors/ illegal content.
I think a successful alt tube need only be 'good enough' ™️ rather than 100% censorship free.(?) That seems to be what is happening with the most successful ones atm. No idea what these platforms have as their business models for long-term
good point. I’ve never really read their terms, but I believe there’s a prohibitive clause in case of child porn or snuff movie, any sickness like that. but then it wouldnt be the case of free speech anymore, ay?, but illegal content. that’s what I meant by censorship free, like rumble vs brazil.
Yeah that is the sort of illegal content I was think, along the lines of your examples.
The Brazil rumble thing I've only heard about. No idea on what grounds rumble is blocked in Brazil, if it's coming to other countries (Canada? Lol). Will have to look into it. Are Brazil coming after all alt tubes I wonder🤔
not all, only after those who dare to question the status quo, lol. like monark who questioned the presidential elections.
is canada still a democracy at all?
I’ve always thought the answer to this issue is to do nonudetube. Say anything you want, but if an algorithm detects anything more than hands and faces it immediately blocks the content. It seems to me like it may have a fighting chance at limiting censorship to necessary things only. Some ideas and expressions are repugnant, but the people should still have the right to express those sentiments.
absolutely. then again: it wouldnt be censorship, ay? as you’ve said, people have all the right to express themselves. if it’s a crime, though, then they’ll respond for their acts.
the problem here is: a new law that creates a new crime as vague as “fake news” or some shit like that.
damn… we’re indeed in a dystopia.
Skirting legal implications is the tricky part. Maybe distributed content based on some BitTorrent protocol, as you watch it you host it with no lasting local data? That would provide database pruning as well, as popularity wanes so does availability. I’d support development of these ideas to some degree. I think the world needs it to avoid centralized fascist thought control. Control the narrative, control the people. That is nothing new.
therein lies the problem. what legal implications and on what matters? the internet should just be an extension of real life. just people carrying out actions, after all, as has been the case since the world as we know it, pre-internet. the basis of every penal code is the ten commandments of the old testament. you shall not kill, you shall not steal, you shall not bear false witness. in the end, they are trying to transform the internet into everything it was born to combat, this control of the narrative, while the path should be the opposite: reassuring individual rights hard won in real life over the last few centuries. I can't think of any truly new crime with the advent of the internet. in the 70s, child pornography was already prohibited. hacking? theft of private property. not even silk road did anything new. the only logical solution would be to transpose real-life crimes (as if the Internet weren't real enough) to the digital world, perhaps as an aggravating factor. in the end, the internet will not allow itself to be censored. they will try, they will criminalize it, they may even be successful among the sheep. but decentralization is already a reality. the consequences of this, how this battle will be fought, is what remains to be seen.
đź’Ż
He did say this was going to happen.
Tbh it may be an option already, but I barely use it and don't have a login there. Maybe it is there lol
I’ve just checked it out. havent seen anything but perhaps my account settings ain’t correctly settled? I’ve watched lotsa streamings where the host gets paid in real time by the audience, so there’s probably something like that already? I believe so.