I could be wrong. But this is what it feels like watching the arguments. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I still haven’t heard a good reason why we need CTV or drivechains.

Me personally, I think it comes down for two things.

1) What is the urgency?

2) Why risk without urgency?

I understand the use case for the future and CTV, but I don't think it is needed, and can certainly be taken into bad places by government coinbase, other non self custody actors.

Right. I truly believe in this bear market, global recession, pivotal point in society it’s not the time to chance anything.

Ride the Tank (BTC). Hunker and Stay the Course.

What is bip300?

A Bitcoin improvement proposal, which could radically alter the Bitcoin network and its use

It is a soft fork, so it can’t a really change anything about what bitcoin _can_ do; it can only enforce new restrictions or require 0 new restrictions, but it can’t violate restrictions already in place.

I don’t know if it’s a good idea or not, but they’re free to code it up and try it out with no effect on the network (of course they can’t put significant value into it as without a soft fork, these new signature-free transactions could be spent by anyone).

What is the goal of this soft fork?

To make spending a new type of unsigned output impossible without a specific kind of proof of work or something like that.

Without a soft fork, anyone could spend these special types of transactions.

Where are the maxis being welcoming? Fuck bip300

Def not. That part of the meme is subjective. 🤙🏻

Thanks for pointing that out.

Bitcoin centralization will allow for this scenario. it'll be fun.