Why are you so eager to draw preliminary conclusions that confirm your own bias? The investigation hasn't even started yet. Is it really that urgent to start the anti-renewable propaganda?
It's only spring and it wasn't even particularly sunny yesterday. The grid in Spain and Portugal is used to dealing with a lot more sun than yesterday in summertime.
European engineers have been warning authorities for years about these dependencies on renewable sources.
Let me get this straight, you trust government officials and their "science" more than actual technicians on the ground?
And then you have the guts to call me a propagandist? No my friend, the bias you speak of is rather a mirror.
The situation was so dire yesterday, it could have caused permanent damage to the grid resulting in tens of thousands of deaths.
They just should have listened, instead of pushing woke policies.
Sources:
https://www.public.news/p/over-reliance-on-renewables-behind
(Investigation by Michael Schellenberger quoting douzens of engineers on the ground)
Us senate testimony on this particular issue:
https://www.energy.senate.gov/services/files/B3F496B5-ADF4-457F-94C8-4257680DCB32
I trust the grid operator engineers to do a solid analysis of the root cause of the problem before I make any assumptions.
You on the other hand, felt the need to judge before any of the facts are even known and then doubled down by quoting a 2023 testimony by Schellenberger, the former propagandist of Hugo Chavez who will say anything for money.
