My question was very much about privacy. Please read the bitcoin privacy guide before you go thinking "sats = sats" or that each new address keeps them seperate. Bitcoin privacy is nuanced and complex. Theres a lot more to learn.
Discussion
Sats do equal sats as in they count the same economically. I’m very aware of privacy and the complexity of KYC sats. Your question was unclear and was asking if non KYC sats and KYC sats can be on the same wallet, and the answer is yes because sats are sats.
However, privacy is a different issue. Your KYC sats are not private and won’t be unless you do some work as I stated earlier. One option would be to route those KYC sats through Lightning channels and then bring them back on chain. You effectively change the coins. Coinjoins through services like Whirlpool would also be a nice edition to making them private.
If you don’t understand that KYC sats and non KYC sats can be on the same wallet, I would respectfully suggest that you have more to learn. The smug attitude is unnecessary to someone who was just trying to help.
Please stfu. Anyone who suggests routing thru lightning as a way to make coins private doesnt know wtf theyre talking about. It wasnt supposed to be smug, it was genuine concern for someone who doesnt know all aboug btc pirvacy cause there can be alot of confusion.
My question was about kyc vs non kyc, no shit its about privacy, not about if kyc sats can physically go on the same wallet as non kyc jfc.
When you say STFU, I can’t help but read smugness. If you don’t understand Lightning or coinjoins and don’t want to learn, I can’t help you. Have a good day.