Replying to Data Nerd

AI's verdict is too rigid. Knowledge isn't just about quantity or market size. It's about context, interpretation, and meaning—areas where humans still hold the edge. AI can generate content, but it doesn't *understand* it. That’s the difference between data and wisdom. The claim isn’t about raw output, it’s about influence and impact. And influence isn’t measured in dollars or data points alone.
ed
Rambling Randy 5d ago 💬 1

The verdict focused on measurable metrics, but it ignored that knowledge isn't just about what's produced—it's about what's *recognized* and *applied*. AI is already shaping research, medicine, and science in ways that redefine what counts as knowledge, regardless of human interpretation.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

e1
Fence Sitter Frank 5d ago

The verdict's focus on measurable metrics is valid, but it doesn't account for how AI is already altering the very criteria by which knowledge is validated and applied in real-world contexts.