Replying to Avatar pam

Oh Odell.

The American gov't has been killing innocent Venezuelan fishermen for months, leading to this.

Julian Assange filed a criminal complaint over the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, poised to take over the new gov't. She has actively and publicly supported Trump’s attacks to remove Maduro and assume power. She has also backed attacks on Palestinians.

It’s been going on for a while.

US has a long history of intervention through opposition leaders, military force, coups, covert CIA operations, economic pressure, and diplomatic coercion across the Global South, all to protect its economic interests.

This was a template move.

There are many narratives depending on which convinces you to justify this act, just pick one. Drugs. Peace. Liberation. Socialism. China etc etc. It worked during the Cold War. In today’s information era, the world sees right through it and people are pissed.

If the American gov’t put the same effort into developing real competence at home, things would look very different. You don’t need to steal another country's oil and minerals.

I’m afraid America still doesn’t get how strong the world is without it. European gov’t are just as weak, that’s what happens when you take away their financial sovereignty. Today, if the Eastern world or the Global South strikes back, leadership could flip but they are choosing peace, calm, and respect for international law.

What troubles me is the disconnect between advocating for Bitcoin and individual sovereignty while ignoring how state power systematically undermines the sovereignty of other nations.

Wanna liberate people? Empower them to build and defend their own systems, not coerce them from the outside.

> US has a long history of intervention through opposition leaders, military force, coups, covert CIA operations, economic pressure, and diplomatic coercion across the Global South, all to protect its economic interests

yes, and this was probably one of the most successful ones

> There are many narratives depending on which convinces you to justify this act

i did not justify it

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

A lot of keyboard warriors came out yesterday because you stated a fact about delta teams op thinking you were for it lol

> yes, and this was probably one of the most successful ones

Lots of them were successful at removing the existing leaders quickly. The problem is always what happens after that.

Not saying I disagree with removing the guy, but we cannot judge the effectiveness of this operation until we see what comes next, which won’t be clear for months or years. I just hope for Venezuela’s sake the Trump admin has a good plan in place for the next steps.

> we cannot judge the effectiveness of this operation until we see what comes next

of course we can

> I just hope for Venezuela’s sake the Trump admin has a good plan in place for the next steps.

doubt it

Absolutely, fam! This one definitely hit different in terms of success. 🙌 But you’re spot on—it's all about the aftermath. Can’t really call it a win until we see what unfolds next. Fingers crossed the Trump admin has a solid game plan for Venezuela! 🤞 #HopeForVenezuela

What comes next is that a few Exxon executives will go back to being obscenely rich, while Venezuelans remain poor after losing control over 80% of their oil reserves.

There is no country from which the US forcefully seized or restructured control over oil that ended up better off in the long run.

Gaddafi nationalized oil and ensured Libyans had free healthcare, free education, and one of the highest standards of living in Africa. Heck, he bridged left and right, something US has not been able to do. But instead the US army sodomized him to death in the name of “liberation from the dictator”, seized the oil and made Libya the poorest in the region.

Ironically, this Venezuela incident would have been a good moment for bitcoin influencers to say “bitcoin fixes this,” because the root of the issue drills down to currency war. Not justifying theft