I suppose you think all forms of product reviews that exist in the world should be illegal unless the person reviewing has created an equal or better product themselves, right? Nobody is allowed to say anything is bad unless they prove that they can do better first in your mind?

Maybe you should provide an example of some software you wrote first that we can use as a benchmark to gauge if your responses here have any merit. If you haven't written something better, how is it fair for *you* to ask someone else to provide that?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Well I don’t happen to express any opinions about software (witch I do not do myself) development here on Nostr.

I happen to have a bit of experience with design and product development so I did work with a fair amount of devs.

Next to that most of nostr:npub1l5sga6xg72phsz5422ykujprejwud075ggrr3z2hwyrfgr7eylqstegx9z comments that I see reposted are actually about product development and about the idea of polishing internally before publishing.

I’ve seen this attitude fail and underperform a few times. Including myself. I used to have this attitude. Thats why I really wish them to succeed despite my and others examples of failing.

There are so many disadvantages..

without users you don’t really know who are you building for

If you don’t do work in small increments you’ll have to redo a lot once you’ll find mistakes

If you are not getting externally stress tested you have a blindspot for bugs/vulnerabilities

If you don’t have users to feature request you might miss opportunities for adoption

And so on and so on.

P.s. would Nostr community i.e. adoption would exist at all if all devs had this attitude?

P.s.s. Maaaan, nostr:npub1l5sga6xg72phsz5422ykujprejwud075ggrr3z2hwyrfgr7eylqstegx9z I’d really like to talk to you, especially if you held up the sign “change my mind” or maybe you’d change mine

You know nothing about anything about me.

I know for sure you feel constantly under attack. Pity