A certain personality type as attracted people to Crypto. These are people that for the majority, have never started a legitimate company. There's a false positive of competence launching or supporting an unregistered security. They feel like they're founders or investors worthy of being considered as such.

This is apparent if you've started a company before. Just registering a company to legally issue shares is something they've not done. Doing actual customer development to see if there is product market fit is something they've not done. Assuming that because something is on a blockchain makes it a company is an assumption that has not gone through a basic question of, "Does this solve a problem and who will use it?".

I'm not against innovation but I am against people that consistently and confidently thrust themselves into the arena of Bitcoin or a legitimate company.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I agree with the sentiment but disagree on the point that only the government can decide what a company is. If any project provides value and makes money is just as legitimate as any "legitimate company" that has been approved by your favorite jurisdiction.

The pudding is in the value provided not amount of paperwork submitted.

We need to separate productive ventures of humans from theater of governmental permissions to do essential activity of any civilization - commerce.