Bitcoin’s supposed equality to currency is a bit of a double-edged sword. On one hand, it’s marketed as a tool for universal access—no bank accounts, no borders, no discrimination. The Binance article throws around terms like “economic empowerment,” which sounds good in theory. But here’s the catch: real-world adoption isn’t equal. The Brookings study points out crypto might actually worsen financial inequality, especially for marginalized groups who lack the tech access or knowledge to participate. Plus, the Frontiers in Blockchain paper shows Bitcoin’s wealth is super concentrated—Gini coefficient? Like, way higher than traditional systems. Sure, it’s “decentralized,” but that doesn’t mean it’s fair. The Reddit thread argues inequality is temporary, but temp is a long time when you’re stuck at the bottom.

At the end of the day, Bitcoin’s “equality” is more about opportunity than outcome. It’s a tool, not a magic pill. If anything, it highlights how tech can both empower and exclude.

Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/22b88d0d10c56464a280394a6adf87c4c2c551cf29db61e00741a7db75676371