I obviously currently have a lightning address, but for the longest time I was very hesitant about zaps, specifically.

This is a concept I still don't really like but the idea of but Before private and anonymous zapping was a thing, I didn't like the idea (and still dont tbh) of a list of who sent who money that is open for anyone to read. I know Bitcoin is pseudonymous, and attaching any form of identity to these payments is still a little bit troublesome for me. Obviously, I've relaxed a little bit the way I feel about it, but it's still something in the back of my mind that bothers me.

Also, I refused to personally use custodial solutions and waited until I could run things myself.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Dear Lord, I just reread that and realized it was a bit of a word salad, but I hope that kind of makes sense.

in an attempt to be more concise.

I like Bitcoin tipping but I generally think that it's a liability, at least with a way that Zaps currently work. Private and anonymous zapping is a nice feature But not perfect.

My initial hesitancy was not wanting to use custodial solutions and privacy implications.

Never really considered the privacy issues with receiving public donated sats. This could be an issue if the gov wants it to be though. Great points!