Not sure how I am able to gatekeep anything. How about countering my arguments instead.
Governments that are willing to harm innocent individuals by assuming some probability thesis that can be both flawed in its probabilities and also impacted by power motives, is definitely in the malevolence spectrum.
If I am willing to pull a lever that can harm innocent individuals, that is a malevolent action even if I have or make up some motives for why it is necessary. Who am I to assume that I have sufficient data in the first place to justify harming innocent people. Central planners don't have access to most of the data and their ideology and power motives will also impact how they define a Trolley Problem.