If a drivechain becomes a threat to the mainchain, it's likely that a significant number of users & stakeholders are benefiting from it. So, the cost of buying miners might be substantial & incentives for such an action would need to be carefully considered.

Why??

If the drivechain employs a different consensus algorithm from Bitcoin's, attempting to control it through miner acquisition might not be feasible & Sidechains, which are designed to operate semi-independently, governance & decision-making processes of a drivechain may differ from those of the Bitcoin mainchain. Thus, the mere act of buying miners might not lead to the desired outcome of terminating the drivechain.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.